Alert: Oppose the Commissioner from Packard!

[NoyoJim]

Time for a change.

Please forward! - Mike Sutton's confirmation as Fish & Game
Commissioner is coming up for a hearing in the Senate Rules Committee
this Friday, Sept. 4th. Letters on associations' letterhead can be
faxed to them for more impact. The RFA opposes this appointment. Our
letter is below.

Contact the Senate Rules Committee and urge a "NO" vote on Sutton's
confirmation as Fish & Game Commissioner:

Phone: (916) 651-4151

Fax: (916) 445-0596 (Corrected!)


-Jim



Monday, August 31, 2009

Senator Darrell Steinberg, Chair
Senate Rules Committee
State Capitol, Room 400
Sacramento CA 95814
Phone: (916) 651-4151
Fax: (916) 455-0596

RE: CONFIRMATION HEARING FOR MICHAEL SUTTON AS FISH AND GAME COMMISSIOER – OPPOSE.

Dear Senator Steinberg,

The Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) is a national 501(c)(4) non-profit grassroots political action organization whose mission is to safeguard the rights of salt water anglers, protect marine, boat, and tackle industry jobs, and insure the long-term sustainability of our nation’s marine fisheries.

On behalf of the RFA, I urge you to reject the confirmation of Michael Sutton as Fish & Game Commissioner.

Mr. Sutton has made himself unavailable to anglers and divers, yet he meets regularly with representatives of environmental organizations; he has even stated that he sees these well-funded, out-of-state organizations as his "constituency" rather than the people of California.

Mr. Sutton has shown complete disregard to the recreational fishing community, and seems unaware that we provide more than $60 million in funding for the Department of Fish and Game through our license fees alone.

As a long-time employee of the Packard Foundation, he has a serious conflict of interest in the Marine Life Protection Act process. The Packard Foundation has provided much of the funding for the MLPA stakeholder process, which is one thing, but to have one of its employees casting a vote on the outcome has caused a complete loss of trust among the fishing communities of California.

It's ironic that the MLPA regulations for the north-central coast will actually damage sustainable fisheries such as abalone diving, and hand-harvest of nutritional seaweed, rather than providing needed conservation benefits. Mr. Sutton simply would not meet with or listen to representatives of the abalone divers to learn more about the data and how the regulations would threaten sustainable fisheries.

Prior to his appointment to the Fish & Game Commission, Mr. Sutton testified as an advocate for specific MPA proposals that call into question his objectivity on the issues.

As a current board member of the political action committee, "Ocean Champions," Mr. Sutton is actively engaged in electioneering and corrupts the stature of the Commission as an independent decision-making body.

Environmental justice is a very important issue to us. When members of the Pomo band at Stewarts Point begged Mr. Sutton to make small adjustments to the MLPA regulations in the north-central region, he refused and broke a cultural link to nature that lasted for hundreds of years for that community. He has voted for regulations that disproportionately affect the low-income sectors of society that can least afford it.

Above all, Mr. Sutton has an agenda for privatizing public trust resources through Individual Fishing Quotas (IFQs) and corporate ownership of commercial fishing operations. He supports private funding for traditional fishery management that will inevitably remove the public even further from decisions affecting people's quality of life, our marine resources and the economic-wellbeing of coastal communities.

The people of California deserve Commissioners who are open-minded and listen to all sides before making a decision. Mr. Sutton has given every impression that he is a lobbyist for a single advocacy group, and not even representative of the entire "environmental community." Recreational anglers in particular feel their public testimony is a waste of time at Fish and Game Commission hearings. This sentiment undermines our ability to engage the public in important regulatory decisions because people know "the game is rigged."

We urge you to reject the confirmation of Michael Sutton as Fish and Game Commissioner.

Sincerely,


Jim Martin
West Coast Regional Director
The Recreational Fishing Alliance

[arch]

Jim............call made this morning from Alaska. I also stated the fact that the appointment of Don Benninghoven should be looked into as well. As he served on the BRTF supporting for the IPA and it was know as soon as he was appointed how he would vote. He might be a great person and valuable to the commission in the future, but I think we will find out in the next regions that he will vote to take the most!!! In my opinion Mr. Benninghoven can and will do more damage in the MPLA process...teamed up with Sutton this could be the battle of the future of salt water fishing.

[NoyoJim]

Sutton was approved in committee 2-1-1 but he got a grilling about his conflicts of interest and biases.

Nice job by all who called in - you win some, you lose some but I think we made a point here.

Time to challenge these bastards on every front.

[arch]

Jim...do you feel Benninghoven has a conflict? Especially with the MLPA and his endorsement of the IPA after serving on the BRTF? I would think that is a bunch of BS too.

[Mistress]

Sutton was approved in committee 2-1-1 but he got a grilling about his conflicts of interest and biases.

Nice job by all who called in - you win some, you lose some but I think we made a point here.

Time to challenge these bastards on every front.

Well...they get away with murder. Tried and aquitted. Would be nice if there's some lasting effect of the "grilling"...but I doubt it. He's already been cleared in the worst possible arrangement. I bet Julie has a glass of champagne and a cigar right now.

The real problem is the guy appointing these crooks. Who with an ounce of decency would even consider such conflicts of interest as OK?